Sema
(The Middle East / Iraq as a Case Study)
Following the end of the Second World War, many formerly colonized nations embraced communism as a political and economic ideology. For these societies, communism appeared to offer an acceptable theory toward liberation from Western imperialism and colonial domination. Marxist ideology promised rapid economic development, land redistribution, social equality, and the dismantling of capitalist structures that had contributed to economic dependency and social marginalization. Furthermore, Marxist theory identified imperialism as the highest stage of capitalism, leading many anti-colonial movements to view communist states such as the Soviet Union and China as potential models for modernization and national development.
Agrarian societies were particularly receptive to communist ideas. Communist movements advocated land reform and the redistribution of property, presenting themselves as defenders of peasants and rural populations against exploitation by wealthy landowners. Consequently, communism gained support among disadvantaged social groups seeking economic justice and social equality.
Iraq was among the countries undergoing profound political transformation during the twentieth century. The overthrow of the monarchy and the rise of republican rule under the leadership of Abdulkarim Qasim marked a significant turning point in the country’s modern history. The Iraqi Communist Party, established in 1934 under the leadership of Yosuf Salman Yosuf, commonly known as Fahd, became one of the most influential political organizations in Iraq.
A considerable proportion of the party’s supporters came from socially and economically disadvantaged backgrounds, many of whom had limited access to formal education. For these groups, communism represented not merely a political doctrine but also a movement advocating progress, social justice, and resistance to exploitation. Unlike the European context in which Marxist theory emerged, the Middle East had not experienced an industrial revolution comparable to that of Western Europe, nor had it been significantly shaped by the intellectual traditions that influenced Karl Marx, including Hegelian philosophy. Consequently, the social and economic conditions that Marx identified as prerequisites for proletarian revolution differed substantially from those found in Middle Eastern societies.
Communist activists in Iraq and elsewhere in the region frequently faced persecution, imprisonment, and even execution because of their political beliefs. At the same time, critics argued that local communist parties lacked ideological independence and remained heavily influenced by the policies and directives of Moscow. This dependence raised questions about the extent to which communist movements in the Middle East reflected indigenous political realities rather than external ideological agendas.
From a theoretical perspective, communism seeks to transform capitalist societies into classless communist societies through revolutionary social and economic change. However, the class structures described by Marx were not fully present in many Middle Eastern countries. The absence of a large industrial proletariat, which Marx regarded as the primary revolutionary force, may have contributed to the difficulties communist movements encountered in achieving their objectives and sustaining long-term political influence.
In Iraq, support for the Communist Party was often concentrated among groups that perceived themselves as politically, socially, or economically marginalized. These included various religious and ethnic minorities, like the Christian, the Yazidis well as segments of the Shi’a population, which historically experienced varying degrees of political exclusion within the Iraqi state. Consequently, communism in Iraq can be interpreted, at least in part, as a political expression of marginalized communities seeking greater social justice, political representation, and protection against perceived systems of oppression.
Dr. Mamo Othman
Duhok, 09.06.2026
